United States v. Gaines
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
In a jury trial Gaines was found guilty of conspiracy to import marihuana in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 952(a) and 963. We find without merit his contentions that the district court erroneously failed to give cautionary instructions with respect to hearsay testimony and that there was insufficient evidence to take the case to the jury. Gaines further urges that it was error for the trial court to refuse to instruct *691the jury as to the statutory definition of marihuana. We disagree and affirm,
Noting that the federal statutory definition of marihuana1 refers only to Cannabis sativa L., Gaines…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. John MooreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Mitchell RothbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Geoffrey HonneusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Robert SifuentesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. MaskenyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Steve A. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Johnnie William Ivey and Joseph TaglioneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.