Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Estate of Binder

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1939No. 17105Published

1DissentMatthews, J.

I am unable to concur m the conclusion reached by my associates in these appeals.

My dissent is not from any rule of law or principle of equity announced by them. The divergence arose when we attempted to apply those principles to the data relating to the transactions disclosed by the record.

That a trustee is required to exercise reasonable diligence and discretion in complete good faith with the single purpose of promoting the nest interest of the trust is indisputable. The rule and the sound policy upon which it is based has not been questioned for centuries. Unless accepted, standards of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Michigan Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Dwight v. HazlettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Keen's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API