Legal Opinion

United States v. Dominique MacK

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 2, 2020No. 16-3734-crPublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

16-3734-cr United States v. Dominique Mack, et al. 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 For the Second Circuit 4 ________ 5 6 AUGUST TERM, 2018 7 8 ARGUED: FEBRUARY 19, 2019 9 DECIDED: APRIL 2, 2020 10 11 No. 16-3734-cr 12 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 14 Appellee, 15 16 v. 17 18 KERONN MILLER, aka Fresh, TYQUAN LUCIEN, aka TQ, aka Frogger, 19 Defendants, 20 21 DOMINIQUE MACK, aka Lil Sweets, 22 Defendant-Appellant. 23 ________ 24 25 Appeal from the United States District Court 26 for the District of Connecticut. 27 No. 3:13-cr-00054 (MPS) – Michael P. Shea, Judge. 28 ________ 29 30…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. MarcusSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. United States v. Matthew JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. James InnocentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Rex HammondCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Lamar JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Andre StaggersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API