Legal Opinion

Hodom v. Stearns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 27, 1969PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

Special Term granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint upon a finding that ‘ ‘ The contacts here are insufficient to sustain the jurisdiction” of the court. In so doing the court failed to consider (as have both parties in this court) certain legal principles that lead us to a conclusion contrary to that reached by Special Term.

CPLR 302, so far as here material, provides that “ a court may exercise personal jurisdiction over any nondomiciliary * * * who in person or through an agent: 1. transacts any business within the state ”. In Millner Co. v. Noudar, LDA (24 A D 2d 326, 328) it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rentways, Inc. v. O'Neill Milk & Cream Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. In re HarperDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1910

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Finance One Public Company Limited v. Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Mercury Coal & Coke, Inc., a West Virginia Corporation v. Mannesmann Pipe and Steel Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  3. Gaskin v. Stumm Handel GmbHDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  4. Louis Marx & Co. v. Fuji Seiko Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  5. Davis v. NehfAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API