Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 23, 1996No. 96-0857-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

Timothy Taylor, an indigent convicted misdemeanant, appeals from the trial court's nonfinal order imposing cash bail as a condition of his release pending appeal. Relying on State v. Lipke, 186 Wis. 2d 358, 521 N.W.2d 444 (Ct. App. 1994), Taylor argues that a trial court may not impose cash bail against an indigent misdemeanant appellant.

The trial court determined, however, that Taylor was not indigent. Alternatively, the trial court ruled that the Lipke language upon which Taylor relied was dicta.

We reverse the trial court's determination that Taylor was not indigent. We also reverse the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. La Crosse Tribune v. Circuit Court for La Crosse CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. Schultz v. BruendlCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smaxwell v. BayardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Gillen v. City of NeenahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Gillen v. City of NeenahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Smaxwell v. BayardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API