Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Erickson

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1995No. 19-11442PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID A. SCHOLL, Chief Judge.

A. INTRODUCTION

The issue presented by the instant joint Chapter 13 ease is whether a plan which contemplates nominal payments and the sale of the Debtors’ realty within an indeterminate period can be confirmed. Since the Debtors’ Amended Plan before us (“the Plan”) is vague in relating any specific terms or commitments of the Debtors and this court has indicated that no further extensions to amend the Plan would be given, confirmation is denied and this case will be dismissed if it is not promptly converted to a Chapter 7 ease by the Debtors.

B. FACTUAL AND…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re LennonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1986
  2. In Re FrickerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. In Re GaviaUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. In Re HogueUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
  5. In Re FordUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re TurnerBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. In Re FelbermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  3. Jensen v. Froio (In Re Jensen)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. In Re AlcideUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Matter of PruettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API