Winey v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Crawford District Court. — Hon. G-. W. Paine, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for the destruction of a wagon belonging to plaintiff, and for personal injuries inflicted upon him through the alleged negligence of the defendant. Trial to a jury, verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
1 *6242 3 *623I. The plaintiff’s petition is in two counts. In the first he seeks to recover for damages done to his wagon, which he alleges was struck and injured at a highway crossing on defendant’s line of road, through the negligence of defendant, and in the second for injuries done to his person, loss of time, etc., by reason of the collision. The alleged grounds of negligence are: “First, the failure of the defendant to sound the whistle or ring the bell of the locomotive engine of the train before reaching the crossing where the injury occurred; • second, because the defendant had constructed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Artz v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Potter v. C., R. I. &. P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Reed v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Brown v. BridgesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Harley v. Merrill Brick Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bruggeman v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Hartman v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Coonley v. LowdenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Schulte v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Clark v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.