Legal Opinion

State v. Baranovich

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 12, 2012No. 081153907; A145579PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SERCOMBE, R J.

Defendant was convicted of theft in the second degree, ORS 164.045, and appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to dismiss the case on statutory speedy trial grounds under ORS 135.747. Defendant was brought to trial on the charge approximately 17 months after issuance of the accusatory instrument. For 10 of those 17 months, defendant was incarcerated in state prison after having been convicted on other charges in another county. Relying on State v. Bircher, 253 Or App 382, 290 P3d 841 (2012), we conclude that, because defendant knowingly failed to demand an early trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. GLUSHKOOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. KirschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. AyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API