Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Smith v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2003No. 2002-0852Published

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Appellant-claimant, Mark A. Smith, alleged that his employer violated a specific safety requirement (“VSSR”) pertaining to the guarding of saw blades. He successfully applied for a VSSR award and appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio set the amount at 15 percent:

*91{¶ 2} “A higher percentage than is granted in this order was discussed at hearing. However, it is noted that the claimant at the time of the injury was both a cabinet maker and foreman. The claimant states in his original application that he had 6 years experience. Because of his experience and position, the claimant should…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State ex rel. St. Marys Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API