Legal Opinion

McAllister v. Case

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 2, 1889Published

On application for leave to appeal to the court of appeals. For opinion on the merits, see 5 S". Y. Supp. 918.

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

The question in this case is whether a person who has filed a mechanic's lien, and is made a party defendant to an action brought by another lienor to foreclose, must file a notice of pendency of action in order to continue his lien. Chapter 342, Laws 1885, § 6. Our general term has held that he need not, (5 N. Y. Supp. 918,) and we are requested to permit an appeal to the court of appeals. As the act is general, and there may be a difference of opinion in the state on the question, I am in favor of facilitating its settlement by the court of last resort. All concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McAllister v. CaseNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1889