Legal Opinion

Bauman v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 4, 1954No. 17344PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter

Roy Bauman was charged with the crime of rape, and, upon arraignment, his sole plea was, “Not guilty by reason of insanity at the time of the alleged commission of the crime and since.” Upon trial on this plea by the jury it found him to be sane, and, after the overruling of his motion for a new trial, he was sentenced to serve a term in the penitentiary.

The motion for a new trial was based on only two alleged errors committed by the trial court, and these are: 1. A statement of the District Attorney was prejudicial to defendant; and 2, the admission in evidence of a doctor’s testimony. We…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carter v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Leick v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  2. People v. SchuemannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. White Missionary Baptist Church v. Trustees of First Baptist Church of WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  4. Hopper v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  5. Leick v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API