Legal Opinion

Van Aalten v. Hurley

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 30, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKS, District Judge.

Sub judice are cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, a stockholder of Curtiss-Wright Corporation, instituted this suit pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C.A. § 78p(b), 1 to recover “short-swing” profits allegedly realized by the individual defendants. The important legal issue presented is whether, assuming arguendo the invalidity of Securities and Exchange Commission Rule X-16B-3, 17 C.F.R. 240.16b-3, 2 the exculpatory provision contained in § 23(a) of the Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 78w, immunizes the defendants from the asserted…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Guffey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  4. United States v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Addison v. Huron Stevedoring Corp. Aaron v. Bay Ridge Operating Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carl Norman Quinn v. Earl L. Butz, Secretary of Agriculture, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. Clifton D. Mayhew, Inc. v. WirtzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  3. Colema Realty Corp. v. BibowDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1983
  4. Atlantic Tele-Network v. ProsserDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2000
  5. Continental Oil Company v. PerlitzDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API