Legal Opinion

Parodi v. Universal Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 9, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBodine, J.

The plaintiff was insured against damage to his car by reason of collision. The policy had the usual $50 deductible provision. On May 11th, 1941, the insured’s car was damaged by collision. Plaintiff’s repairman charged $193.85 for the repairs made. The company’s agent estimated that the work could have been done for $98.65. The court gave the plaintiff judgment for $143.85. Defendant appeals.

The rule of law with respect to damages in similar cases is to be found in Hintz v. Roberts, 98 N. J. L. 768. The argument is made that the plaintiff’s repairman charged for a new tire to replace one…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harper v. Pelican Trucking CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. State Farm Mut. Auto. v. ToroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  3. Irons v. N.J. Dept. Institutions and AgenciesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. FRANCISCO FERRO VS. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY (DC-3097-17, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API