Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lamar William Jones Bey v. Kelly Johnson and Wayne Trierweiler

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 27, 2005No. 03-2331Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partClay, Circuit Judge

While I join, in part, the majority’s ultimate conclusion that Jones-Bey’s First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Johnson must be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies I believe that the majority’s failed attempt to apply a total exhaustion rule is foreclosed by our prior decision in Hartsfield v. Vidor, 199 F.3d 305 (6th Cir.1999). Although I respectfully dissent from the exhaustion holding reached by my colleagues, I am not sure that a dissent is actually necessary because the majority’s decision constitutes a nullity to the extent that it…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API