Legal Opinion

Havens v. Hartshorn

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1945PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatt, J.

These are motions by the defendant Doehler Die Casting Company to (1) amend the captions or titles of the actions as set forth in the notices of motion herein, (2) to vacate the two orders of Mr. Justice Swift granting the defendants Hartshorn, Thornton and Walls (hereinafter referred to as defendants) the right to issue supplemental summonses and amended answers containing cross complaints against the Doehler Die Casting Company (hereinafter referred to as impleaded defendant) and (3) to dismiss the said cross complaints on the ground that the same failed to state facts sufficient to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson-Starrett Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Fox v. Western New York Motor Lines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Caulfield v. Elmhurst Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  4. Smith v. 167th Street & Walton Ave. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Susskind v. 1136 Tenants Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1964
  2. 630 McKinley Square Corp. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1967
  3. Caserta v. Town & Country House & Home Service, Inc.Nassau County District Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API