Legal Opinion

Roy v. Louisville N. O. & T. R. Co.

United States Circuit Court

Decided March 7, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

At Law. Ex parte application by an infant to sue in forma pauperis.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

This is an ex parte application by an infant plaintiff to sue in forma pauperis. He is a citizen of Arkansas, and his declaration, presented with his application, alleges that he was personally injured by the negligence of the defendant company, while traveling as a passenger on its train. He accompanies his application with an oath of his own poverty, and also the oath of his next friend as to his poverty, likewise; and he presents a certificate of a good cause of action by a reputable attorney, as required by our ruling in Bradford v. Bradford, 2 Flip. 280.

It is thoroughly well-settled in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bradford v. BradfordU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1878

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. O'CONNOR v. MatzdorffWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Williams v. SpencerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1978
  3. Campbell v. Criterion GroupIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Brinkley v. Louisville & N. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1899
  5. In re CollierDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API