Legal Opinion

Dines v. Harris

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 30, 1930No. 12,307Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

The parties’ names appear here in inverse order from that in the trial court. Harris will be referred to as petitioner and Dines and Fancher as respondents, as in the district court.

Petitioner procured a peremptory writ of mandamus compelling respondents to allow him an inspection, at all reasonable times, of all the books, accounts and papers of the Colorado and [Utah Goal Company, hereafter called the company or coal company, and to take copies or make extracts therefrom. Respondents bring the case here on writ of error to review the judgment.

Pleadings, orders and proceedings in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Walton v. WaltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Costelo v. Middlesex Banking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  3. American Mortgage Co. v. RosenbaumOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. People Ex Rel. Lamme v. BucklandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  5. Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API