Legal Opinion

Paparone v. Ader

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.

On February 5, 1931, the plaintiff gave notice that he would take the deposition of Dr. David B. Mendelson and Dr. H. L. Liberman at Rochester, N. Y., on the ground that Watkins Glen, the place of trial, was more than one hundred miles from the residence of said witnesses. The defendant Ader moved to vacate this notice on the ground that said distance was less than one hundred miles. On the argument this was conceded. This motion is, therefore, granted.

On February 13, 1931, the plaintiff served notice that he would take the deposition of said witnesses at Rochester on the ground that “…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Town of Hancock v. . First National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Victor G. Bloede Co. v. J. P. Devine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Mayer v. New York Canners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Loomis v. MarshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  5. Barnet v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reif v. GebelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. In re the Estate of RubinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. Pfaudler Permutit, Inc. v. Stanley Steel Service Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Hill v. Lee, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API