Rothe Development, Inc. v. United States Department of Defense
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON
PILLARD, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Rothe Development, Inc. (Rothe) alleges that the statutory basis of the Small Business Administration’s 8(a) business development program, Amendments to the Small Business Act, Pub. L. No. 95-507, ch. 1, sec. 202(a), 92 Stat. 1757, 1761 (1978) (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 687), violates its right to equal protection under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Congress created the 8(a) program to extend government contracting opportunities to small business owners…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- St. Joan Antida High School In v. Milwaukee Public School DistriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Budha Jam v. International Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- Lelchook v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Friedman v. Fed. Aviation Admin.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Cognitive Professional Services Inc. v. U.S. Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.