Legal Opinion

Staub v. Tripp

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1929No. Docket No. 110, Calendar No. 34,381PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this suit to recover damages for breach of covenant of title. In May, 1922, Mr. and Mrs. Tripp gave plaintiff a warranty deed of certain property located on the easterly shore of Lake Michigan in the city of South Haven. A pavilion known as the Big Casino was supposed to be located on the land conveyed. The deed contained the usual covenants, and the consideration was $40,000. The land was described as follows:

“Lots one to six inclusive, lots 25 to 30 inclusive and the north half of lots 7 and 24, in Block twelve of Dyckman & Woodman’s Addition to the Village (now city) of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crane v. ReederMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Kavanaugh v. BairdMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Schneider v. Lipscomb County National Farm Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Young v. Thendara, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Caywood v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Johnson v. FischerMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API