Legal Opinion

State v. Trujillo

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 2019No. Case No. 20170615PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Chief Justice Durrant authored the opinion of the Court, in which Associate Chief Justice Lee, Justice Himonas, Justice Pearce and Justice Petersen joined.

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice Durrant, opinion of the Court:

Introduction

¶1 Timothy James Trujillo challenges his conviction under Utah's witness retaliation statute. 1 This statute makes it a crime to direct a threat of harm or a harmful action against a witness or a person closely associated with that witness as retaliation against that witness. It is undisputed in this case, however, that the witnesses-who were the subject of the alleged threat-were not present when Mr. Trujillo made the threat. And the State has not argued that Mr. Trujillo intended to have someone relay the threat to the witnesses, nor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. RasaboutUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. LambdinUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. TrujilloCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ApodacaUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Thompson v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2024
  3. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  4. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API