Legal Opinion

Chozen Confections, Inc. v. . Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

It is apparent that the judgment by default final was improvidently entered. It was irregular. Under tbe allegations of the complaint, plaintiff was entitled only to a judgment by default and inquiry. C. S., 595, 596; Byerly v. Acceptance Corp., 196 N. C., 256, 145 S. E., 236; Supply Co. v. Plumbing Co., 195 N. C., 629, 143 S. E., 248; Jeffries v. Aaron, 120 N. C., 167, 26 S. E., 696. Nor could the liability of the sureties on the indemnity obligation exceed that of the principal. S. v. Guarantee Co., 207 N. C., 725, 178 S. E., 550.

However, upon the motion to set aside the judgment on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jeffries v. . AaronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Supply Co. v. . Plumbing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Tickle v. . HobgoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Cayton v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Bank v. . LovenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Prichard v. NelsonDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1942
  2. Prichard v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  3. Bank v. . LovenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Chozen Confections, Inc. v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API