Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Taylor

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 13, 1928No. 26,609PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

We are of the opinion that our holding that the securities here involved are tangibles has been reversed by the recent case of Silberman v. Blodgett, ___ U.S. ___, 48 S.Ct. 410,72 L. ed. 470. So construing the Silberman case, it reduces these securities to mere choses in action. Consequently our opinions cited in subdivision 1 of the former opinion are applicable. This is upon the theory that the owner must invoke the laws of this state to enforce the securities. State ex rel. Graff v. Probate Court, 128 Minn. 371,150 N.W. 1094, L.R.A. 1916A, 901; State ex rel. Marsh v. Probate Court, 168…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blackstone v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Blodgett v. SilbermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. v. DoughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. State ex rel. Graff v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. State Ex Rel. Marsh v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API