In Re Estate of Taylor
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion
We are of the opinion that our holding that the securities here involved are tangibles has been reversed by the recent case of Silberman v. Blodgett, ___ U.S. ___, 48 S.Ct. 410,72 L. ed. 470. So construing the Silberman case, it reduces these securities to mere choses in action. Consequently our opinions cited in subdivision 1 of the former opinion are applicable. This is upon the theory that the owner must invoke the laws of this state to enforce the securities. State ex rel. Graff v. Probate Court, 128 Minn. 371,150 N.W. 1094, L.R.A. 1916A, 901; State ex rel. Marsh v. Probate Court, 168…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blackstone v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Blodgett v. SilbermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. v. DoughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State ex rel. Graff v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Marsh v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Estate of TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928