Legal Opinion

Kerner v. Surface Transportation Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

After deliberating for about two hours, the jurors asked to have reread the court’s charge, the testimony of plaintiff Kerner and that of defendant Kelly. The court in declining to comply stated that it did not believe it necessary to read the entire charge or the entire testimony called for, but intimated to the jury that it could have any particular portion of the charge or any particular part of the testimony which was desired. The refusal to comply with the jurors’ request was duly excepted to by all parties. A ten to two verdict in favor of plaintiff and against all three defendants was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Der Harst v. KoenigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Futoransky v. Nassau Electric RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. James v. Key System Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Towli v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. Zobre v. SchuttigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Bloch v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Genco v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API