Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bethea v. Rahaim

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1944No. 35472Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

Smith, C. J.,

delivered a dissenting opinion.

I am of the opinion that the court below erred in setting aside the receiver’s sale of this'property. The appellee is not attempting to assert a right to enforce a lien on the property or to assert a claim of ownership thereto notwithstanding its sale by the receiver; consequently the cases of Gayden v. Tufts, 68 Miss. 691, 10 So. 53 and Cashin v. Murphy, 132 Miss. 834, 96 So. 747, have no application here.

Section 469, Code of 1930, as amended by Chapter 327, Laws of 1936, authorizes the chancery court and the chancellor in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gayden v. TuftsMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. McCainMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Cashin v. MurphyMississippi Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API