Legal Opinion

Jones v. Porretta

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 11, 1984No. Docket 70998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this medical malpractice action, plaintiffs appeal an order denying a motion for new trial. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in giving the jury an instruction which deviated from the Standard Jury Instructions by adding the statement that "no physician can be required to guarantee results”. Plaintiffs’ attorney made a timely objection to the instruction on the record and also raised the issue in their motion for new trial. The record discloses that the issue of guaranteed results was never *243injected into the trial by evidence or arguments. We hold that such an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Javis v. Board of Education of the School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Warfield v. City of WyandotteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Cleveland v. RizzoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CorbetMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Dziurlikowski v. MorleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Gibson v. HenkinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Gibson v. HenkinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Johnson v. CorbetMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API