Legal Opinion
South Main State Bank v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 6, 1963No. 11053PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHER, Chief Justice.
This appeal is from a judgment of the Trial Court in a garnishment proceeding, unfavorable to appellant.
The State filed suit on May 1, 1961 against Refinery Construction Company for delinquent unemployment taxes, and obtained a judgment on June 14, 1961.
On the same day the suit was filed the State instituted this garnishment suit against Rohm & Haas Company, which filed its answer admitting an indebtedness to Refinery Construction Company in an amount of $26,146.89, and impleaded the United Stat.es, South Main State Bank, W. D. Gunnels Company, and other named creditors…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Glass City Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Michigan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Parker Square State Bank v. Triangle Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Seligmann v. Hill & CombsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Abramson v. BoedekerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. LesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- In Re Blast Energy Services, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Harold C. Abramson, Trustee for Casco Chemical Corporation, Bankrupt v. Waller C. Boedeker, United States of America v. Harold C. Abramson, Trustee for Casco Chemical Corporation, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- South Main State Bank v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963