Chertok v. Chertok

OPINION OF THE COURT

Norman Feiden, J.

In this support proceeding, the respondent moves to vacate, annul and set aside the order of the Hearing Examiner on the grounds that Family Court Act § 424-a (b) is unconstitutional. *879This court has not found any written decision concerning this section and so this is a matter of first impression. The Attorney-General, having been served with a copy of the motion papers, was made a party to these proceedings but has declined to participate.

After a foreign divorce, respondent was required to pay $170 per week alimony and child support. Thereafter, in…