Legal Opinion
United States v. Gustavo Holguin
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 15, 1989No. 86-2710PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
This matter is before the court on the government’s petition for rehearing. 1 For the reasons set forth in this opinion we grant the petition for rehearing and affirm Mr. Holguin’s conviction under the continuing criminal enterprise statute. We also find no merit to his contentions concerning the sentencing proceeding, an issue we found unnecessary to reach in our original opinion. In all other respects, our original opinion, reported at 860 F.2d 801, is reinstated.
I
In our original opinion, we determined that there was insufficient evidence to permit a jury to find that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Herbert SperlingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Gary HalbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Moreno L. Keplinger, Paul L. Wright, and James B. PlankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- United States v. Mason Townsend, Luis E. Diaz, Orlando Nunez, Dorothy Taylor, Carlos Mejia, Joseph Angel Claudio, and Isabel MarquezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Kojo Sababu, Jaime Delgado, and Dora GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.