Gavle v. Little Six, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant Jill Gavie challenges the trial court’s application of sovereign immunity to an Indian tribal business corporation alleged to have engaged in tortious conduct on and off the reservation. We affirm, finding no warrant for this court to refuse to apply sovereign immunity, and finding that the respondent tribal business corporation did not expressly waive its immunity.
FACTS
Appellant alleges sexual harassment, pregnancy and race discrimination, civil rights violations, and various related torts arising from her employment with respondent Little Six, Inc., and the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Multimedia Games, Inc. v. WLGC Acquisition Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2001
- Cohen v. Little Six, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Gavle v. Little Six, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Gavle v. Little Six, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996