Latta v. Stout

This case involves the same property described in Sine v. Stout, 119 Colo. 254, 203 P. (2d) 495, decided this date, and the opinion in that case should be read in connection herewith.

It is well to note in passing that prior to the execution of the sheriffs deed June 4, 1946, mentioned in the companion case, plaintiffs herein (Lattas) were the owners of an undivided one-tenth interest in said mining claim; that four-tenths thereof was owned by Maurine S. McMullin, and five-tenths by Katherine E. Sine; that the Sine and Lattas interests were sold for taxes and redeemed by McMullin as cotenant…