Legal Opinion

Trinder v. Connecticut Attorneys Title Insurance

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 22, 2011No. 2010-271PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. Homeowners filed a declaratory judgment action to establish defendant title insurance company’s obligations to defend or indemnify them regarding an encroachment of their septic system onto neighboring property. They appeal the trial court’s conclusion that the terms of their title insurance contract did not require title insurer to defend or indemnify homeowners to establish a right to maintain the system. The court found the circumstances were not within the covered title risks absent an action on neighbor’s behalf to force removal of the septic system. On appeal, homeowners argue that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Quenneville v. ButtolphSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. Progressive Insurance v. Brown Ex Rel. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. Town of Troy v. AMERICAN FIDELTY COMPANYSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. CNA InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  5. First Nat. Bank of St. Johnsbury v. LaperleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rotman v. Progressive InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013
  2. Fidelity National Title Insurance v. Woody Creek Ventures, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. Town of Ira v. Vermont League of Cities and TownsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  4. Century 21 Farm & Forest v. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2026
  5. Drinan v. Green Mountain Stock FarmVermont Superior Court · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API