Legal Opinion

Heise & Bruns Mill & Lumber Co. v. Goldman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City. (Dobler, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtConstable, J.

There is but one exception in this record, and that arises from the action of the Court below in granting a prayer at the conclusion of the plaintiffs testimony, directing a verdict for the defendants, upon the ground that there had been offered no evidence legally sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to recover.

The action was in assumpsit and upon the common counts, and was for the purpose of collecting an unpaid balance due the appellant for building materials. The defendant, George O. Goldman, a building contractor, filed a special plea of discharge in bankruptcy, to which no replication…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morrison v. WhitesideCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
  2. National Mechanics' Bank v. National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  3. Henderson v. MayhewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1844
  4. Rosenstock v. TormeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  5. York County Bank v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Hampton Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1981
  2. Heslop v. DieudonneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Jones v. Sherwood Distilling Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  4. Knopf v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Frederick W. Berens, Inc. v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API