Legal Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Lichota

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1968No. D. D. No. 85PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Under Section 5 (a) of Rule XVIII of the Rules of Practice, misconduct includes “* * * any violation of the Canons of Professional Ethics * * *” and “* * * conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude * * The crime of “having devised and intended to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud and for obtaining money by false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, and knowingly conspired to cause the mails to be used for the purpose of executing said scheme to defraud” is, as a matter of law, a crime involving moral turpitude and constitutes misconduct under Section 5 (a) *219of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Guthery v. JacobyOhio Court of Appeals · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. BowmanOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. ZimmermanOhio Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API