Legal Opinion

Baker v. Milam

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 3, 1995No. 94-961PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

Appellant, Joanne Baker, appeals an order of the Newton County Circuit Court granting summary judgment to appellee, Philip E. Milam, D.D.S., on her claim for dental malpractice. The trial court applied this court’s decision in Weidrick v. Arnold, 310 Ark. 138, 835 S.W.2d 843 (1992), and ruled appellant’s claim was barred by the two-year statute of limitations, Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-203 (Supp. 1993). Appellant alleges three points of error in that ruling. The Arkansas Court of Appeals certified this case to us for statutory interpretation. Jurisdiction is therefore…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weidrick v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Pugh v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Thomas v. CornellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Wiles v. WilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Parmley v. MooseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. QuirkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Felton v. Rebsamen Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Flemens v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. R.J. "Bob" Jones Excavating Contractor, Inc. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, New JerseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Equity Fire & Casualty Co. v. NeedhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API