Legal Opinion

Michael H. Stough & Barbara M. Stough v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 2, 2015No. Docket 8256-11Unknown

1Opinion of the Court

Ruwe, Judge:

Respondent determined a $300,332 deficiency in petitioners’ 2008 Federal income tax and a $58,117.20 accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a). On one of their 2008 Schedules E, Supplemental Income and Loss, petitioners reported as rents received a $1 million payment from Talecris Plasma Resources, Inc. (Talecris). Petitioners then claimed an offsetting $1 million Schedule E “contribution to construct” deduction (Schedule E deduction). Upon examination respondent disallowed the $1 million Schedule E deduction but increased petitioners’ basis in the subject rental property and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  3. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Neonatology Assocs., P.A. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  5. Knudsen v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API