Legal Opinion

United States v. DiBona

District Court, D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 83-1311Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMES McGIRR KELLY, District Judge.

Presently before the court is defendants’ motion for reconsideration of my January 15, 1985 order denying their motion for a protective order. The defendants state two reasons why the January 15th order should be vacated. First, the information the government needs to discover is not relevant. Second, the government is relying upon “grand jury materials” in contravention of Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e). After careful consideration of both these issues, the court will deny defendants’ motion for the reasons set forth below. The facts of this instant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. In Re Grand Jury Matter. Appeal of Nicholas CataniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. DiBonaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API