Lomax v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICIA L. COHEN, Judge.
Introduction
Gary Lomax appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County granting DaimlerChrysler Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Mr. Lomax’s claim for disability discrimination in violation of the *477Missouri Human Rights Act (“MHRA”). We reverse and remand.
Facts and Proceedings Below
Mr. Lomax began working at Daimler-Chrysler in June 1969 as a union worker on the two vehicle assembly lines at the DaimlerChrysler plant in Fenton, Missouri. During his employment, Mr. Lo-max experienced a series of medical problems that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Daugherty v. City of Maryland HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Janice Turner v. Kansas City Public SchoolsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Thomas Denn v. CSL PlasmaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Janet Hurst v. Kansas City, Missouri School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Loth v. Union Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Baldridge v. Kan. City Pub. Sch.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.