Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Glass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 13, 1981Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLazer, J.

This appeal presents another factual variation among the growing

number of circumstances which inspire appeals seeking reversal on the ground of repugnancy. In affirming, without opinion, my colleagues obviously have concluded that no repugnancy exists. In my view, no explanation based on this record can accommodate defendant’s conviction for unlawful possession of a weapon with his acquittal on the charges of attempted murder and assault in the second degree. The record reveals that during the course of a four player game of dominoes in a neighborhood delicatessen, a dispute over some aspect…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. People v. DercoleNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. People v. CarbonellNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. PierceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API