People v. Glover
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*878The trial court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s challenges for cause to two potential jurors. The statements made by the two prospective jurors “did not rise to the level of actual bias or otherwise indicate that [they] would be unable to render an impartial verdict” (People v Smith, 48 AD3d 489 [2008]; see People v Ross, 12 AD3d 463 [2004]; People v Archer, 210 AD2d 241 [1994]). Thus, “there was no basis for the [County] Court to administer an expurgatory oath or sustain the defendant’s challenge[s] for cause” (People v Smith, 48 AD3d at 489; see People v…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. LegetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. QuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. CintronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. Barrett-JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.