Legal Opinion
Kressel, Rothlein & Roth v. Gallagher
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 20, 1989PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an interpleader action to determine who is entitled to a deposit made under a contract for the sale of real property held in escrow by the plaintiff, the defendants Terrence F. Gallagher and Arlene E. Gallagher appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), entered July 28, 1988, as denied their cross motion for summary judgment, and granted *588the defendants-respondents’ motion for summary judgment to the extent of directing a return of the contract deposit.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
O…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Grossman v. PerlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Lieberman v. PettinatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Weaver v. HilzenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lindenbaum v. Royco Property Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Zahl v. GreenfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Finkelman v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- 1550 Fifth Avenue Bay Shore, LLC v. 1550 Fifth Avenue, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Chavez v. Eli Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.