Legal Opinion
Manhattan Construction Co. v. District Court of Oklahoma County
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 26, 1973No. 46998PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
This is an application to assume original jurisdiction and for a writ of prohibition by Manhattan Construction Company, (Manhattan) to prevent the respondent, Judge of the District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, from proceeding further in a certain action now pending in that court. Manhattan alleges that the court is without jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action because the exclusive remedy for the damages claimed resides in the State Industrial Court. We agree.
The plaintiff, Ray Paul Dean, (Dean) filed an action seeking recovery for personal injuries sustained…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fox v. DunningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- W. P. Atkinson Enterprises, Inc. v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Dolese Bros. Co. v. AndrecopulasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Traders and General Insurance Company, a Corporation v. A. N. Edwards and H. E. TurpinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- MILLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. WentholdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Richard v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Arrington v. Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe-Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Baker Ex Rel. Radford v. Hunn Roofing, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1975
- Arrington v. Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe-Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Opinion No. (1979), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.