Legal Opinion

Montague v. Jewelers & Tradesmen's Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, the Jewelers and Tradesmen’s Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 5th day of April, 1899, as resettled by an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 26th day of April, 1899, denying the defendant’s motion to bring in Rachel Flint as a co-defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.:

The order denying the defendant’s motion to bring in Rachel Flint as a co-defendant was properly made. The action was brought against a corporation created under the laws of the State of New York, and which issued a policy of insurance, called a certificate of membership, upon the life of one A. F. Flint. By the terms of that policy or certificate, the defendant undertook to pay within sixty days after the receipt of satisfactory evidence of the death of Flint, “to Henry E. Droz of New York City (the plaintiff’s testator) such amount as upon the death of A. F. Flint, it may be…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Montague v. Jewelers & Tradesmen's Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Lopez v. KelloggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API