People v. Weeren
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHARDSON, J.
Defendants Hans H. H. Weeren and Steven C. Jennings appeal from the judgments of conviction of the misdemeanor violation of Fish and Game Code section 2000, which generally and in relevant part provides: “It is unlawful to take any... fish... except as *659provided in this code or regulations made pursuant thereto.” The convictions are based on trial court findings that defendants with the use of a spotter aircraft took broadbill swordfish contrary to the regulations of the Fish and Game Department (Cal. Admin. Code, tit. 14, § 107, subd. (g)(2)). This regulation specifically…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Skiriotes v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- F/V AMERICAN EAGLE v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Ward v. United Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. DupierAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- California Gillnetters Ass'n v. Department of Fish & GameCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.