State v. Hamilton
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Swinehart, J.:
This is a direct appeal from a conviction of theft by deception. The first issue presented is basically whether under the facts of this case there was sufficient evidence to find defendant guilty of theft by deception (K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 21-3701[b]).
Briefly stating the facts, defendant contacted Glenn Fire Protection to have an automatic fire extinguisher system installed in his restaurant. The system was installed on February 19, 1979. On the following day, Coley Glenn, the principal owner of the company, presented defendant with an invoice for $910 and requested payment.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. McCormickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- State v. FinchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- State v. HandkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- State v. SaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- State v. ViscoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RingiSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- State v. FriasCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021