Legal Opinion

State v. Charlot

Louisiana Court of Errors and Appeals

Decided February 15, 1844PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of St. Landry, Boyce, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNicholls, J.

Previously to entering on the merits of this case two preliminary questions have been raised, on the part of the State, which it is important to dispose of. It is contended on the part of the State, first, that it is the decided jurisprudence in England, whence we derive all our doctrines in criminal matters, not to allow new trials in cases of felony, and that the only remedy is by an application to the clemency of the crown ; and, secondly, that it is equally well settled law, that a Court of Errors can, in no case, correct or control the decisions of the inferior courts upon questions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zacharie v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. In re AnonNew York Supreme Court · 1831

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  2. State v. PradeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  3. State v. AndrusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  4. State v. AndrusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API