Legal Opinion · Dissent

Boren v. Scott

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 17, 1996No. 86749Published

1DissentHansen, Presiding Judge

I dissent. The majority is clearly correct in holding if the parties were indeed joint venturers, Scott is immune from sMt in district court pursuant to § 12 of the Workers’ Compensation Act. However, I am not convinced the trial court was correct in finding, as a matter of law, that Scott and Cross were joint venturers who agreed to share losses as well as profits. Where facts are in dispute, existence of a joint venture presents a question for determination by the trier of fact. Sigma Resources Corporation v. Norse Exploration, Inc., 852 P.2d 764 (Okla.App.1992). Questions of fact should…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stuckey v. Young Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Weeks Ex Rel. Weeks v. Wedgewood Village, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Sigma Resources Corp. v. Norse Exploration, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API