Legal Opinion

United States v. Kergil

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 9, 2018No. 17-3082-crUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17-3082-cr United States v. Kergil UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. United States v. BindayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Norberto Quintero-LeyvaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Stanley PresendieuCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API