Legal Opinion

Schenectady Tile Co. v. Schoonmaker

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1933Published

1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.

This is a motion on behalf of the State of New York to reopen the above-entitled action for the purpose of determining what right, if any, the Standard Surety and Casualty Company has in the funds involved in said action and why such surety company should not be made a party defendant.

The action was commenced by plaintiff to foreclose a mechanic’s lien filed by it against moneys due or to become due the defendant Schoonmaker under a contract with the State for the completion of the field artillery armory at Kingston, N. Y. The contract was completed December 23, 1932, and accepted on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Radiator Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Upton Co. v. FlynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API