Legal Opinion

Hauser v. Schlissel

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittohi, J.

This proceeding, in the nature of a writ of prohibition, has been brought pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act and is to restrain certain public officials from any further prosecution of the defendant under an information charging a violation of subdivision 4 of section 1897 of the Penal Law.

The defendant was arrested upon an information, sworn to by a complaining witness on July 14, 1960. It charged the defendant with a violation of subdivision 5-a of section 1897 of the Penal Law—a felony. Thereafter, upon the defendant’s demurrer, Hon. Abraham Schlissel, City Judge of Long…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Weiner v. Warden of City PrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Ragan, New York County Courts1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API